Justice wrote: No, the issue with Clinton was that he LIED to a Federal grand jury, an impeachable offense.
And quite frankly, there is NO proof that President Bush ever did cocaine. That is just another liberal lie, but then again, you aren't worried about the truth.
Clinton was the one who admitted he smoked drugs, it wasn't us who brought it up.
By the way, did you know that Clinton was the first ex-Federal criminal to become POTUS?
prove to me where Clinton was CONVICTED of being a draft dodger? He was NEVER CONVICTED of it. He was accused of it. Never tried, never convicted. Thus, never an x-federal criminal you ignorant ass.
They could accuse anyone of being a draft dodger you idiot. Cheney was a draft dodger...is he an x-federal criminal too? Accusations do not criminal charges make....thus Clinton is not an x-federal criminal.... Now, what Karl Rove did is a felony punishable by the feds...wonder how that is going to turn out ...the outing the CIA agent thing....hmmm...
Justice you said that Clinton was an x-federal criminal who became POTUS...We was NEVER tried for evading the draft. Never CONVICTED of it. He was never a federal felon. DAMN you are stupid. Being IMPEACHED means to have charges brought against. He was acquitted, and then censured. Dodging the Draft does not make you a federal felon unless you are tried and convicted of it. You are incorrect about him being a federal criminal and a federal felon, and frankly teetering with liable laws...
A felon has no voting rights. Clinton does have voting rights. For a person to be a felon or x-criminal he must be tried and convicted first. The articles of impeachment were not passed, thus Clinton not removed from office. (which would have been the result of conviction /sentencing) He was "impeached" but "acquitted". I believe your name is Justice for all...just not Clinton. Know the law and the facts, then come back to my blog with something intelligent to say.
You say clinton is a felon one more time on my blog I am going to file suit against you with the state of oklahoma. Either prove it or shut up. You can't prove Clinton a felon. That is like saying anyone who was tried and found not-guilty by a jury is still guilty. Your absorption of law is very limited Justice. Just cause someone is accused of something, doesn't make them a criminal or a felon you dumbass.
Get over clinton. You right-winged nut jobs can't get over him. He was a great man. B your own admission about Bush's alcoholism that the "past is in the past.."just not Clinton's... So, your logic saying that Clinton is a x-federal criminal without being indicted, tried or convicted...that makes Laura Bush an x-felon cause she should have been tried for involuntary manslaughter? But since she wasn't....she is no more a criminal than clinton. Bush should have been in federal prison for securities fraud along with jonathan and neil bush...but he was never tried and convicted...thus not a x-federal criminal. So, Justice, Clinton is not a federal criminal, x-federal criminal, x-felon, or felon. For you to call him a rapist on my blog is simply unacceptable and frankly against lible laws.
so, prove to me that Clinton was convicted of draft evasion...thus the pardon would apply. He was never convicted of draft evasion. you stupid redneck idiot.
Failure to report does not make you a federal criminal. As you name suggests...Justice for all. For someone, even a draft dodger to be called a criminal...he must have a due process of law. Geroge Bush failed to report and we know that....but remember he was working on a campaign.
Show me the proof of William Jefferson Clinton being tried and convicted of draft evasion....show me the proof and i will conceed, take down my blog, and appologize...
SHUT UP!!! Accusations do not convictions make. We have something in this country called DUE PROCESS. If he did draft dodge, he would have been tried, convicted and sentenced...then the pardon would apply. Prove the trial and conviction of W.J. Clinton for draft evasion and I will conceed.
I am not calling Bill Clinton a RAPIST or a FELON. He is neither and has not been tried and convicted of either accusation. Prove that he was tried, convicted or don't come back to my blog. I am asked you not to come back to my blog. If you come back after being not to post anymore, with false and defamatory accusations that are technically lible, it is harassment.
you are on my blog telling me to shut up? Go away uneducated redneck!!! You are no longer welcome on this blog, but I am keeping it open to the public. I am asking you NOT TO POST HERE ANYMORE !!!!
A "felon" is someone who was tried and convicted of a felony. Don't bother looking up the law...get a dictionary Justice.... Clinton neither was tried, or convicted of any felony...so again...prove it or shut up mullet boy
I've got to visit 'Justice for All's blog and read some of his other historical 'facts'. Then I might write a humourous story with his 'facts'...could call it 'Justice's World of Right Wing Spin'.
I admit I love Bill Clinton, what liberal democrat doesn't. But, I'll admit, he is flawed. He is also human. I know he lied in front of the American public and under oath. I know this. I know what it was about. It wasn't about viles of anthrax or weapons of mass distruction. It wasn't about securities fraud or campaign contributions. It was about sex. I know about censure and impeachment. I know, but don't really dwell on it. So, quit telling me I don't know the "truth" or that Clinton lied. I know. I just really dont think it was THAT big of a deal...the sex thing, not the purgery thing. It was wrong and he appologized for it. Bush didn't want to admit his drunk driving arrest cause his daughters didn't know. Well, since most the Bush family including the twins have pretty much all been in trouble one way or another related to drinking I think that was a lie. Is it important? Well, if you are asked on a job interview (which it was) if you have ever been detained or arrested for alcohol related crimes, and you answered "no" then your employer later found out it was "yes" you could be fired. I think a little boozing wouldn't have hurt those crazy twins anyway. But how about a little girl having to hear the explicit details of her father's sexual trists? Maybe Clinton was trying to hid his imperfections as well. I am sure they are both good dads and care about their kids. But Bush wouldnt go under oath to answer ANYTHING! Not even in front of the 9/11 commission. So, Clinton might have lied and that is wrong...but Bush has lied so much, just not under oath, that he is getting away with it.
26 Comments:
Justice wrote:
No, the issue with Clinton was that he LIED to a Federal grand jury, an impeachable offense.
And quite frankly, there is NO proof that President Bush ever did cocaine. That is just another liberal lie, but then again, you aren't worried about the truth.
Clinton was the one who admitted he smoked drugs, it wasn't us who brought it up.
By the way, did you know that Clinton was the first ex-Federal criminal to become POTUS?
Now, THAT is a joke for a POTUS.
Actually, get your facts straight, He was never convicted. He was censured by the Senate only cause they couldn't pass the articles of impeachment.
it doesnt make sence..POTUS stands for President of the United States. Your statement:
By the way, did you know that Clinton was the first ex-Federal criminal to become POTUS?
doesn't compute. Maybe I am dumb...but it would be:
By the way, did you know that Clinton was the first ex-federal criminal to become president of the united states?
What federal crime did clinton commit, get indicted for, convicted for, and acquitted for BEFORE becoming President of the US???
OH, please!!!!!! Gimme a break!!! So that makes bush one too for going AWOL? Failing to show for medical tests? Damn. give it up Justice.
prove to me where Clinton was CONVICTED of being a draft dodger? He was NEVER CONVICTED of it. He was accused of it. Never tried, never convicted. Thus, never an x-federal criminal you ignorant ass.
They could accuse anyone of being a draft dodger you idiot. Cheney was a draft dodger...is he an x-federal criminal too? Accusations do not criminal charges make....thus Clinton is not an x-federal criminal....
Now, what Karl Rove did is a felony punishable by the feds...wonder how that is going to turn out ...the outing the CIA agent thing....hmmm...
come on justice...bring on the proof.....or just admit you are wrong.....
My guest blog for the day....I am devastated :-(
Jo
What's Your Political Persuasion?
You Are a Liberal Republican
When you tell people that you're Republican, they rarely believe you.
That's because you're socially liberal - likely pro-choice and pro-gay rights.
You're also not so afraid of big goverment, as long as it benefits people and not politicians.
You are the most likely of any Republican type to swing over to the Democrat side sometimes.
What political persuasion are you
at blogthings.com
Justice you said that Clinton was an x-federal criminal who became POTUS...We was NEVER tried for evading the draft. Never CONVICTED of it. He was never a federal felon. DAMN you are stupid. Being IMPEACHED means to have charges brought against. He was acquitted, and then censured. Dodging the Draft does not make you a federal felon unless you are tried and convicted of it. You are incorrect about him being a federal criminal and a federal felon, and frankly teetering with liable laws...
A felon has no voting rights. Clinton does have voting rights. For a person to be a felon or x-criminal he must be tried and convicted first. The articles of impeachment were not passed, thus Clinton not removed from office. (which would have been the result of conviction /sentencing) He was "impeached" but "acquitted". I believe your name is Justice for all...just not Clinton. Know the law and the facts, then come back to my blog with something intelligent to say.
You say clinton is a felon one more time on my blog I am going to file suit against you with the state of oklahoma. Either prove it or shut up. You can't prove Clinton a felon. That is like saying anyone who was tried and found not-guilty by a jury is still guilty. Your absorption of law is very limited Justice. Just cause someone is accused of something, doesn't make them a criminal or a felon you dumbass.
Get over clinton. You right-winged nut jobs can't get over him. He was a great man. B your own admission about Bush's alcoholism that the "past is in the past.."just not Clinton's...
So, your logic saying that Clinton is a x-federal criminal without being indicted, tried or convicted...that makes Laura Bush an x-felon cause she should have been tried for involuntary manslaughter? But since she wasn't....she is no more a criminal than clinton. Bush should have been in federal prison for securities fraud along with jonathan and neil bush...but he was never tried and convicted...thus not a x-federal criminal. So, Justice, Clinton is not a federal criminal, x-federal criminal, x-felon, or felon. For you to call him a rapist on my blog is simply unacceptable and frankly against lible laws.
Again, Justice. He had to be TRIED AND CONVICTED OF DRAFT EVASION. HE NEVER WAS!!!! GET IT THRU YOUR THICK STUPID SKULL!!!!
so, prove to me that Clinton was convicted of draft evasion...thus the pardon would apply. He was never convicted of draft evasion. you stupid redneck idiot.
Failure to report does not make you a federal criminal. As you name suggests...Justice for all. For someone, even a draft dodger to be called a criminal...he must have a due process of law. Geroge Bush failed to report and we know that....but remember he was working on a campaign.
Show me the proof of William Jefferson Clinton being tried and convicted of draft evasion....show me the proof and i will conceed, take down my blog, and appologize...
Accused of Rape makes one a rapist. Wow...you are truly ignorant of law and due process in this country.
SHUT UP!!! Accusations do not convictions make. We have something in this country called DUE PROCESS. If he did draft dodge, he would have been tried, convicted and sentenced...then the pardon would apply. Prove the trial and conviction of W.J. Clinton for draft evasion and I will conceed.
I am not calling Bill Clinton a RAPIST or a FELON. He is neither and has not been tried and convicted of either accusation. Prove that he was tried, convicted or don't come back to my blog. I am asked you not to come back to my blog. If you come back after being not to post anymore, with false and defamatory accusations that are technically lible, it is harassment.
you are on my blog telling me to shut up? Go away uneducated redneck!!! You are no longer welcome on this blog, but I am keeping it open to the public. I am asking you NOT TO POST HERE ANYMORE !!!!
A "felon" is someone who was tried and convicted of a felony. Don't bother looking up the law...get a dictionary Justice....
Clinton neither was tried, or convicted of any felony...so again...prove it or shut up mullet boy
I've got to visit 'Justice for All's blog and read some of his other historical 'facts'. Then I might write a humourous story with his 'facts'...could call it 'Justice's World of Right Wing Spin'.
I admit I love Bill Clinton, what liberal democrat doesn't. But, I'll admit, he is flawed. He is also human. I know he lied in front of the American public and under oath. I know this. I know what it was about. It wasn't about viles of anthrax or weapons of mass distruction. It wasn't about securities fraud or campaign contributions. It was about sex.
I know about censure and impeachment. I know, but don't really dwell on it. So, quit telling me I don't know the "truth" or that Clinton lied. I know. I just really dont think it was THAT big of a deal...the sex thing, not the purgery thing. It was wrong and he appologized for it. Bush didn't want to admit his drunk driving arrest cause his daughters didn't know. Well, since most the Bush family including the twins have pretty much all been in trouble one way or another related to drinking I think that was a lie. Is it important? Well, if you are asked on a job interview (which it was) if you have ever been detained or arrested for alcohol related crimes, and you answered "no" then your employer later found out it was "yes" you could be fired. I think a little boozing wouldn't have hurt those crazy twins anyway. But how about a little girl having to hear the explicit details of her father's sexual trists? Maybe Clinton was trying to hid his imperfections as well. I am sure they are both good dads and care about their kids. But Bush wouldnt go under oath to answer ANYTHING! Not even in front of the 9/11 commission. So, Clinton might have lied and that is wrong...but Bush has lied so much, just not under oath, that he is getting away with it.
Very cool design! Useful information. Go on! surveillance equipment bugging free spam blockers Austin infiniti Dome surveillance camera Renault kangoo van muffler Effexor pills side effect
Keep up the good work Allegra albion idaho what to leave on answering machines car rentals silute cadillac for sale Microsoft xp professional compatable external hard drive Valtrex missed periods 2000 dodge stratus automatic tranmission review Vitamins for muscle spasms security systems for communities Diazepam hplc Engines and transmissions gmc maxtor hard drives home page Sweaters by hand No fax online payday loan answering machine tv themes financial planning and debt Free big booty blonde clips Free mobile phone service plans comparison The diffrence between wellbutrin xl and sr
Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. paintballing perth online forex platform Buy+bontril+cheap http://www.buyzoloft8.info/zoloft_and_other_medications.html Hot tub surround furniture gmc pickup truck Acuvue+contact+lens Free xxx stocking movies 6 foot bathtubs pet toys Fire alarm voice communication systems canada Children's footwear Lamborghini diesel engines
Post a Comment
<< Home